TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion III Survey

To: Lee <lee@wa3fiy.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III Survey
From: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: n4py3@earthlink.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:30:36 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Making a new transceiver that uses superhetrodyne now would be like making a car that used a point ignition system now.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 2/21/2017 4:37 PM, Lee wrote:
Why do we NEED to go that way Barry?

-Lee-
WA3FIY

------ Original Message ------
From: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: 2/21/2017 4:21:30 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III Survey

;
Snip
;
You will eventually NEED to go to a direct sampling architecture (Orion
4), although you might get away
with one legacy dsp IF rig (Orion 3).

Barry N1EU
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>