Yes, it looks like a nice rig. Please post your impressions after playing
with it Rick!
I vaguely remember some comments about cw performance. I know it doesn't
do QSK but hopefully it does smooth semi-breakin.
73, Barry N1EU
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:20 PM, rick@dj0ip.de <Rick@dj0ip.de> wrote:
> I just spoke about 45 minutes on the phone, then SKYPE with one of the
> engineers who designed this radio.
>
> In a nut shell, "looks good."
>
>
>
> I took a lot of notes, some of which I did not understand and perhaps I
> noted something wrong.
>
> He was talking fast.
>
> In any case it sounded good to me.
>
>
>
> More important, I WILL HAVE ONE HERE, SOON;
>
> hopefully before my April 1st SOTA outing (remember "Fool on the Hill").
>
> This will be much easier to lug up the mountain than my old Scout.
>
>
>
> Some Data Points:
>
>
>
> . DDC / DSP 24 bit
>
> . Filter for each band (almost; a couple share 2 bands)
>
> . -45 dBc
>
> . 2 differential paths (meaning 2x AD and 2x DA)
>
> . Stereo DSP
>
> . This enables eliminating almost all phase noise
>
> . Signal + Noise / Signal - Noise = Signal without noise
>
> . Usable with higher SWR (important!) Folds back power rather than
> shutting down altogether like the FT817 does.
>
> . Latency 48 ms !!! (Vy good for SDR)
>
>
>
> My expectation ("speculation"): it may not be quite as good as a KX3 but
> should be significantly better than all of the other QRP radios in the $500
> class.
>
>
>
> Sounds like this may be just what I was looking for.
>
> I will test it's receiver compared to my Eagle, Scout, and FT-900.
>
>
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>
> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
>
>
>
> 73
>
> Rick, DJ0IP
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|