That "TOR" spec is also important for we traffic operators who use
Pactor. Hmmmm....? My present radios including Pegasus, Orion classic,
Argonaut VI work very well on Pactor as I move scores of messages per
month. I wonder how these latency issues being discussed affect Pactor
operation? Hoping Ten-Tec keeps that in mind in new designs.
73,
-Lee-
WA3FIY
------ Original Message ------
From: "Ken N9VV" <n9vv@wowway.com>
To: "Kimberly Elmore" <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec
Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: 12/10/2015 12:43:24 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Transmitters...
*AND* The ARRL has removed the "TOR" (T/R time <=20ms) test for Pactor
and Amtor with very little comment. That was an important and essential
test data point for us CW operators. I am sorry to see it disappear
from their evaluations.
72/73 de Ken N9VV
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|