To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting |
From: | "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:42:40 +0100 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
NO, absolutely not! We are discussing the future of ten-tec and what features the radios should or should not have. Understanding SDR technology will help us define our own needs to Ten-Tec. I found Duane's comments but also replies from Carl and some of the others to be the most valuable tidbit of information that I have picked up on any ham reflector for quite some time. THANKS guys! 73, Rick - DJ0IP -----Original Message----- From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Berg Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:25 PM Wouldn't this lengthy discussion of a competitor's radios be a lot more appropriate on the Flex reflector? Steve WA9JML _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please, k7mks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface, rick@dj0ip.de |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting, Steve Berg |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting, Barry N1EU |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |