TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI 2.8 INRAD filter for key clicks

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI 2.8 INRAD filter for key clicks
From: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:49:30 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Same experience here
Installed the 2.8 INRAD filters and LOVE them for general ssb use
However, you may also benefit from touching up the bfo frequencies and carrier null which it probably needs anyway as Barry mentioned. Also, with the wider filter the carrier null becomes more touchy to do. I replaced the two pots with ten turn trimmers to make it easier.
Paul K0UYA

-----Original Message----- From: Barry N1EU
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 8:43 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI 2.8 INRAD filter for key clicks

Not really true in my experience John.  The BFO oscillator alignment is
exactly the same.  I believe the only step actually recommended was to
touch up the carrier null adjustment, which is a very simple process that
all Omni 6's could probably benefit from anyway, even if the filter wasn't
changed.

73, Barry N1EU

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:17 AM, John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com> wrote:

As I recall, installing the Inrad filter to fix key clicks in the OMNI VIs
necessitated adjusting the front end's alignment to accommodate it. And
this, I perhaps recall incorrectly, made for other problems. I never did
it.

73,

John, W3ULS
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>