TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Comparisons

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Comparisons
From: "John Simon" <jrsimon@ozemail.com.au>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:07:55 +1000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I couldn't agree more!
If you don't like your Ten-Tec transceiver, receiver etc, send it to me. I'm QTHR in the Call book.

73, John de VK2XGJ
Well another day has passed
and I didn't use Algebra once!

-----Original Message----- From: sojka534 .
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 12:46 PM
To: TenTec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Comparisons

If I wanted to know how much better your Yaesu, Icom, Kenwoods are, I'd go
to their respective sites, but  I don' t give a rats patoot, so drag your
jap crap radios and opinions back to your toy box and let me play with my
inferior Ten Tecs.
73 and good (ten tec) dx
Paul
KS2S
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>