TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TX Noise

To: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TX Noise
From: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: n4py3@earthlink.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:45:43 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
None of the Flex radio data here applies to the new Flex 6000 series. The Flex 6000 series is a whole new design.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 7/28/2014 7:27 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
Several guys asked about why no SDRs were included, not realizing that
the K3 and KX3 are SDRs with knobs. To address their interest, I've
added the other three SDR transceivers that ARRL has tested to the
plots. I've also corrected a labeling error on one of the plots, added a
plot of phase noise for a 500 Hz bandwidth, and added some text. It's
all still at k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf I suspect that these plots will make
it clear why contesters aren't thrilled with these radios.

By all means, before you consider one of the Flex radios, be sure to
study this work by Leif Asbrink, SM5BSZ.

http://sm5bsz.com/dynrange/dubus313.pdf

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>