Not so fast, Dick Tracy. The argument clearly cuts both ways. A bit of
a dilemma, actually.
The list was, undoubtedly, posted to suggest what is a good contest radio.
But, if, he and you both suggest, the rig is actually immaterial, and it
all turns on operator skill and good fortune, then any discussion of
what radio is used is misplaced. You cannot have both ways. It is
inconsistent to say the rig does not affect the result, and then praise
any one or more radios as better contest radios because operators used
them over other options. Either the rig matters, or it does not. If it
matters, then it is a fact 5 of six 6 used by the top three teams were
made by ICOM. If it does not matter, we should not try to draw any
conclusion, or make any statement about the radio based on contest use
or result - because, as you say, it does not matter.
From all accounts offered so far, the most likely reason teams chose
the K3s, is it is small light, and easy to travel. If the rig is
immaterial, then any talk about the rig's technical and ergonomic
prowess is logically misplaced.
Or, if you want to say the rig matters, then we are back to the fact the
ICOMs stole the show.
------------------ JHR -------------------------
On 7/25/2014 9:57 AM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
This discussion by Jim, Rick, Carl and others is VERY interesting
regarding WRTC.
The list of radios, brands and models and the number of each, including
the logging programs used, adds tremendous creditability solely to the
operators. Again it to me points out the radio becomes a somewhat minor
part of the success equation. The major part clearly is the operators
and their efficiency in the process using the chosen tools at hand.
Jim, K9YC, did a fine analysis of various parameters supporting the
final results.
______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|