To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] tenTec merger, etc. |
From: | Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 22 May 2014 18:18:13 -0700 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Yes, that's the upside, Rick. But, I don't trust the FCC if some group with the big money comes along. The only saving grace is that no one wants the HF spectrum. 73 de Jim - AD6CW On 5/22/2014 1:38 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote: Jim, I know first impression, that is bad, but the good news is, we have inherited probably a hundred thousand of these guys. They keep the ham statistics up, which gives us a better shot at keeping our spectrum allocation. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Emergency Networks, Phil Sussman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] tenTec merger, etc., Jim Lowman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] tenTec merger, etc., Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Emergency Networks, Stuart Rohre |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |