TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Merger

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Merger
From: Robert <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 20:14:40 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
When I was with SONY any service work was taxed on the city, county, & state 
where the labor & parts were used. If we did depot work & shipped the repaired 
item, tax was applied based on address of receipt. 

No avoiding taxes. 

73
Bob, K4TAX

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 12, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net> wrote:
> 
> With today's rules you would most likely pay that tax no matter where they 
> were based.  Slowly we are being forced to pay state taxes on anything we buy 
> through the internet.  One way of trying to level the playing field for the 
> local retailers that are loosing business to E commerce.
> 
> Cecil
> K5DL
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On May 12, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Don Rasmussen via TenTec 
>> <tentec@contesting.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I live in California, I don't like paying tax on labor performed in 
>> Tennessee.
>> 
>> I do like K4TAX Bob, a good ham indeed.
>> 
>>>> First thing RFC/TT should do is move service to some place where it is not 
>>>> unfairly taxed.
>> 
>> 
>>>> And maybe you can explain that further..... Cecil
>>>> K5DL 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>