TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna

To: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:54:32 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Actually, Rrad is less that of the 0.075 wavelength vertical section because you've ignored the opposing currents in the radial "hat" wires.

With 16 buried radials - averaging 30ft to 40ft long - the efficiency came out at 70%.

Steve G3TXQ



On 09/11/2013 16:24, Jim Brown wrote:
While your design certainly has merit, radiation resistance is still small -- it's that of the 0.075 wavelength vertical section. Electrically short verticals are thus extremely dependent on excellent radial systems.


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>