TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two

To: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two
From: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:05:45 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Ah, Jim,

I wish that were so. Shocking, but true. After all yesterday I ran into a
ham and was showing him my HF mobile set-up. He remarked, "why do you need
an antenna when you can operate full duplex anywhere in the world with your
cell phone?"

Study? Who needs to study? Just use your cell phone! Gee .. I really wonder!

73 de Phil - N8PS

-----

Quoting Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>:

On 11/1/2013 9:11 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
If someone jumps straight into RFI ham, I'm sure he'll get a shock, unless he is pretty tech savvy.
Gee, I'm sorry to hear that. I tried very hard to write it for  
someone who understood the basics of electronics, electrical  
circuits, transmission lines, and antennas. Is that assumption  
unreasonable?  And I've tried to write in a form that "tells the  
story," leading logically from point A to point B to point C.
There's also an important difference between casually reading  
something as opposed to really studying it.  It took me years to  
figure this stuff out, and I understood these fundamentals quite  
well. Someone seeing these concepts for the first time should expect  
to STUDY it, not just read it casually.
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>