To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two |
From: | Andy Flessner <k9arm1@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:59:19 -0500 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> 132 feet on each side fed with 180 ish feet of 600 ohm open line. That goes to an external 1:1 balun feed with three feet of LMR400 to the coupler. It might be interesting to put an analyzer on the coax after the 1:1 balun and see what kind of impedances you are trying to match. I had a 132 ft doublet with 100ft of 4" homebrew open wire line - abt 550 ohm line, calculated, on the apartment roof (until they made me take it down) with a 4:1 current balun. It worked great on 80-10 with my 238 tuner, but could not match 160. I was able to match it when I used a Heathkit 2060, but I was losing at least 1/2 the power out. I assumed the doublet was just too short for 160 and I never got to try a 1:1 balun, which might have made it better because of the low impedance. I thought about borrowing an analyzer, but didn't bother after reading some of Maxwell's info, It sure worked well on 80-10 for a simple wire. Pretty noisy above the apartments, though. Andy K9ARM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two, John Huffman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two, Mike Bryce |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two, Mike Bryce |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |