TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Tuner

To: "k9yc@arrl.net" <k9yc@arrl.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Tuner
From: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:31:36 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Just wondering. 

How bad is the swr at the low end you are trying to use? 

Mike wb8vge

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 8, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:

> On 7/8/2013 1:57 PM, Stuart Rohre wrote:
>> You are doing nothing wrong, the 3.8 MHz antenna is just too short to reach 
>> 3.5 MHz! 
> 
> While it has generally been my experience that antennas tend to tune more 
> easily a bit above resonance than below, there is no good reason that a 229 
> or 238 should not match a dipole that resonates on 3800 down to 3500.
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>