This is interesting as I have a TS-930S. The old QST review showed that
its TX IMD performance was middling at best: 3rd order is -25 dB and 5th
order is -42 dB. Somewhere, I read that increasing the idle current on
the PA from 1.3 A to 2.1 A helped the IMD performance "a lot" and so
I've done that. I Also increased the driver bias to 70 mA.
The '930S also has a reputation of lots of TX and RX phase noise, though
not as bad as the '940S. The TX phase noise is most easily identified
clearly on CW. To help with RX, I put the 6 kHZ INRAD roofing filter in
the 44 MHZ 1st IF and took it to FD last year for a battle-field test.
Unlike before, the RX was now bullet proof, but I was worried about TX
phase-noise QRM to the other stations. Early on, I did some testing with
the other stations (using CW) to check for problems. I was very
surprised to be told there were none (and I went to to the other
stations to listen for myself)! I know for a fact the the TS-930S K0RF
had would pummel me with phase noise if he pointed his antennas at me
while I lived in Longmont, CO.
All that said, I never tried phone with it at FD but I'll give it a shot
this year as a quick test to see if the IMD wipes out everyone else.
Kim N5OP
On 6/17/2013 1:07 PM, Barry N1EU wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@dj0ip.de> wrote:
I understand how most of you guys who have never experienced this may be
finding it difficult to believe.
But once you've experienced it live, I guarantee you will jump on the
bandwagon with me.
I have experienced this in spades, especially from FT-1000 variants and
TS-930S.
73, Barry N1EU
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|