To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Jun 2013 04:54:48 -0700 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 6/14/2013 4:37 AM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote: I tend to agree that running an external speech processor AND the internal processor at the same time would not seem be the better configuration. Right. This is an example of "more is NOT better." There's enough bad audio on the air -- why add more? A good rule of thumb is no more than about 10dB indicated compression on peaks. More than that quickly starts to get nasty. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor, GARY HUBER |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor, GARY HUBER |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor, GARY HUBER |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor, GARY HUBER |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |