TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] (no subject)

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)
From: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: wb5jnc@centurytel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 19:19:53 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I'm a little late with the reply here, but I think this needs to be said. It 
is a rarity indeed to see a spokesman for a U.S. company give a "mea culpa" 
simply because they didn't bring a product to market as promised.

To me, this says a lot about Ten-Tec's commitment to customer service, not to 
mention the continued support of their legacy products (which is also rare.) 
This reinforces my intent to continue owning, and buying, Ten-Tec products.

Just my $0.02 worth.

73, Al

On Fri May 17 2013 8:10:32 pm John Henry wrote:
> Rick,
>
> I full well feel the same as all here. This has to be one of the two
> biggest failures to date in product fulfillment.
> We had shown a working built in high speed receiver sweep at Dayton about
> ?? 5-6 ?? years ago in an Orion II. And stated that we would do the same in
> the OMNI-VII. Missed many dates on this one.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>