For clarity on this point, James is referring to an email I sent him
off-line comparing AF and RF compression, NOT my post earlier to the group,
which Carl corrected.
Cheers
Rick, DJ0IP
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Richards
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 2:26 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Speech Processor Question
HOLD THE PHONE, GUYS.... IT IS AN RF-BASED COMPRESSOR AFTER ALL!
HERE IS WHAT STAN BROCK SENT TODAY, which
appears to have some input form the infamous
John Henry... I love to see tag-team
problem- solving!
Based on this explanation, and what Rick, DJ0IP says, I will keep my Model
715, notwithstanding the Omni VII has an RF-based compressor after
all. Sometimes a dedicated device can do better than another device
which must handle multiple duties and functions.
Rick usually has good advice... even if I don't
move on it right away ... ;-)
Thanks for the input !
---------------------- K8JHR -----------------------
On 3/15/2013 8:21 AM, Stan Brock wrote:> James, > > > Sorry, I went back
into the code and we indeed have it in the RF > processing section in the
DSP, Very sorry for the incorrect answer. I > need to verify things before
I answer.
> The 712 itself does do a better job because it is taking the af of the >
voice, converting it to rf, etc back to af, without the other rf >
processing done inside the dsp, so, it is more effective. Most find the >
internals work about as good. But some of the compression is lost in the >
DSP where it is not lost in the 712.
> My bad, sorry.
>
> Thanks, and 73,
> John Henry, KI4JPL
> TEN-TEC Engineering
---------------------------------------------------
..
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|