To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II |
From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:10:22 +0000 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Simulating the TT diplexer I see just a couple of S11 excursions worse
than -18dB (SWR=1.3:1), at 10MHz and 8MHz.
Steve G3TXQ On 13/03/2013 20:45, Steve Hunt wrote: Jerry,Both the L and the C in the diplexer parallel arm are fixed value; so low Q sounds good, given the tolerance issue :)However the L in the series arm of the diplexer is adjustable, and the book says to tweak that for max received signal, as you'd expect.73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II, Steve Hunt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II, Barry N1EU |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II, Steve Hunt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II, Barry N1EU |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |