To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] Grounds and balanced fed verticals |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:29:53 -0800 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 1/26/2012 7:57 AM, Steve Hunt wrote: > The difference in loss is almost totally down to the smaller conductor > diameter, not to differences in dielectric loss. Yes. Thanks for these posts, Steve. Several years ago, I prepared a Q&A style tutorial on Coax and Stubs, with the emphasis on application to the HF bands. It can be downloaded from my website http://audiosystemsgroup.com/Coax-Stubs.pdf Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] Grounds and balanced fed verticals, Jim Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] Grounds and balanced fed verticals, Steve Hunt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] Grounds and balanced fed verticals, Richards |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] Grounds and balanced fed verticals, Steve Hunt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |