| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] X-lock 3 VFO Staibilizer is online | 
| From: | Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> | 
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> | 
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:11:20 +0000 | 
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> | 
| Un-stepped tuning, lower phase noise, and desire to keep it original perhaps? (DDS also has its advantages, don't get me wrong) Barry N1EU On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:02 AM, <scottsheppard@videotron.ca> wrote: > I may be missing something, but why would you have a PTO and this additional > circuit when you can replace with a simple DDS? > > scott Va3ied > > _______________________________________________ > TenTec mailing list > TenTec@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] X-lock 3 VFO Staibilizer is online, scottsheppard | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] X-lock 3 VFO Staibilizer is online, Keith Hamilton | 
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] X-lock 3 VFO Staibilizer is online, scottsheppard | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] X-lock 3 VFO Staibilizer is online, Keith Hamilton | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |