Barry, this depends on how well the radio control software is able to control
the OM6+.
When I had my OM6+, I never did anything with it from the computer, except the
exchange during the contest.
Maybe Carl knows that.
My gut feeling is that it would not work, but who knows!
73
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Barry N1EU
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:24 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX366 Update
Yes, the Orion already has the dual routing of antenna/oscillators
plus second dsp and AF circuitry in place. The Eagle lacks all this.
But if magic could happen Rick, how about making it work with not only
the Eagle but the Omni 6+ as well? ;-)
Yes, I should eventually be the Omni 6 mute and T/R timing expert.
I'm gathering the tools to attack in force.
73, Barry N1EU
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@dj0ip.de> wrote:
> Barry,
>
> First, AGREE, we don't want to overload JH here.
> He's already overloaded.
>
> Now if the RX366 is available as a stand-alone receiver, everything else we
> need to do to slave it to an Eagle can be done with software, except for
> managing the antenna switching and mute. The Eagle is RADIO-1, the RX366 is
> RADIO-2, the software keeps them on the same frequency. Using different
> antennas on each, it would be kind of a subset of true diversity receive,
> but it would work.
>
> BTW, I understand you are now our resident expert on this mute bit - hi!
>
> 73
> Rick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:47 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX366 Update
>
> I worry about inundating John Henry with so many questions. He must
> be VERY busy with a lot of projects. I appreciate the fact that he
> shares so much information already with the reflector.
>
> I'll take a stab (speaking only for myself, not John)
>
> Yes, the RX366 is essentially the Eagle receiver. A simple facility
> will be provided to easily align the oscillators of the RX366 with the
> Orion main receiver from the front panel, within a fraction of a
> hertz. I don't know if you could strictly call this "phase locked"
> but it works quite well for antenna diversity.
>
> The RX366 filters will be simply plug-in and configure in the Orion
> Filters menu.
>
> Personally, I doubt it can be used/salved with the Eagle. The Orion
> is the platform if you want dual receivers.
>
> 73, Barry N1EU
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
> wrote:
>> Sounds like the RX366 is essentially the Eagle receiver. John, can you
>> confirm that? And if that is so, is there an easy way to operate it
>> "slaved" and phase locked to the Eagle receiver, so that it could be
>> used in a multiple receive antenna diversity arrangement?
>>
>> I have experienced this with an Elecraft K3, which is one of the few
>> dual receiver transceivers in which the two receivers are identical. On
>> the low bands, particularly 160 meters, it really works good, improving
>> copy during fades. Deep fades often do not occur simultaneously on both
>> antennas. And I find the stereo effect of one receiver and antenna in
>> each ear desirable. This only works well when both receivers are phase
>> locked. The two receivers cannot have different frequency resolution
>> step sizes.
>>
>> I'd love to have this capability from Ten-Tec.
>>
>> John Henry wrote:
>> Since the RX366 is mostly based on Eagle boards,
>>> when we set up for stuffing the 599 boards, we can build more of the
>>> same board for multiple products without the cost of tearing down the
>>> mydata "stuffer" and setting it back up for a different board.
>>
>> DE N6KB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|