| To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT? |
| From: | "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:22:32 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
The article didn't mention other major brands, just showed a few examples. I wouldn't worry about it. 73 -----Original Message----- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Hunt Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 1:41 PM To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment Subject: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT? Subject says it all! http://www.edn.com/article/519742-Ham_radio_in_the_21st_century.php Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer, Richards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?, Keith Hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?, Richards |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in, art davis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |