TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] FW: Slightly OT

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] FW: Slightly OT
From: Bill Harris <w7kxb@msn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:56:46 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>








Art:The losses incurred, in a short piece of coax, at those frequencies will be 
insignificant.Carry-onBill-w7kxb

> From: atrampler@att.net
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:12 -0500
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Slightly OT
> 
> But doesn't that create the situation of increasing losses due to the
> mismatch between the coax and the ladder line at the balun? It seems that
> adding ladder line would be less lossy.
> 
> Thoughts?
> Art
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP
> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 2:50 PM
> To: atrampler@att.net; 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Slightly OT
> 
> That makes it easy.  Just add 7'8" of RG213 to the coax.
> 
> This may not help, but then again it might.
> As I said, I have has similar funny experiences with the 238.
> To be more specific, with 3 different 238's and a few different antennas;
> always when the inductance was best at about zero.
> 
> 73
> Rick
> 

                                                                                
  
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>