TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] (no subject)

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)
From: Jim Vohland <n9vo@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:50:25 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Or maybe (hopefully) they are just holding some stock back for the big ten tec 
hamfest next weekend!!! 
 

> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:48:08 -0400
> From: jruing@ameritech.net
> To: w8mjm@yahoo.com; tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)
> 
> Maybe... hopefully they just sold more rigs than they anticipated and
> just need to re-stock. It might have gone better than they expected,
> as opposed to being a total flop. It may all depend on their 
> construction cycle... hopefully they are a breath away from restocking.
> 
> Maybe there is a bright side to all of it. I prefer to be optimistic, even
> though I have no more evidence than supports our being pessimistic.
> 
> 
> Thought for the day =
> 
> The OPTIMIST believes this is the best of all possible worlds...
> While the PESSIMIST AGREES ... this is as good as it can get...
> 
> So you ya just never know... ;-)
> 
> ----------------
> Happy Trails.
> 
> ======================= Richards / K8JHR =======================
> 
> On 9/15/2011 17:32, matthew martin wrote:
> > It appears that Ten Tec wants to go out of business. On their web site they 
> > have been out of stock on the Omni 7 for over a month and now they are out 
> > of stock on the Eagle with a tuner. They are forcing hams to buy rice boxes.
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
                                          
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>