TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] eagle

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] eagle
From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
Reply-to: geraldj@weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:33:35 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>


On 4/2/2011 6:21 PM, Don Jones wrote:
Power dB = 10LOG*(P1/P2).

That's fine formula for gain and loss based on power ratios, but not a great benefit in figuring power to a dummy load with a voltmeter. And what you use as a indicator for the dummy load affects the way you compute power. For DC its P = E * E / R. For a half wave peak reading meter (and pure sinewave) its P = 0.5 * Ep * Ep / R. For a peak to reading like get on the oscilloscope its E = Epp / 2.828427 where 2.828427 is the square root of 8.00000, then apply P = E * E / R. Or P = Epp * Epp / ( 8 * R)

73, Jerry, K0CQ

Question #1, do you have a calibrated volt meter? Might be useful to check your 
input voltage.
Question #2, is your "50 ohm load" calibrated?
Question #3, I am not familiar with the Motorola Comm Analyzer... Is it rated 
for HF freq's? It is my impression that the Motorola stuff is mostly VHF/UHF 
rated equipment.

Good question on its frequency rating.

Go back to the post from 9JML about his experiences comparing final tuning test bench results with QC at a Motorola factory building two way radios. He fought differences with "calibrated" equipment all the time.

Peace,

Don Jones ko7i
Arlington, WA


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Bryce [mailto:prosolar@sssnet.com]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:37 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] eagle

I have access to a very expensive motorla comm analyzer. $50k, calibrated to 
traceable standards.

My personal coaxial dynamic watt meter and if course a 50 ohm dummy load.

So, I am not using an old radio shack CB watt meter, but calibrated RF test 
equipment.

Mike

Sent from my iPhone



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>