TNX for your reply Neal
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:38:30 -0600
> From: neal.laugman@gmail.com
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Was I bad???
>
> Philip,
>
> Maybe no one has :) I have the older 234 so I wouldn't know, but I
> doubt that there is a lot of difference electrically. AFAIK the new one
> is an RF processor just as the old one is.
>
> --
> Neal, NL7VL
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:30:04 -0500
> "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Good morning folks,
> >I have not seen any replies to my posts, the last one asking if any
> >one has tried the TT 715 speech processor with older TT radios.
> >
> >If I did something wrong or offended any one, I apologize.
> >
> >Phil (Andy) W3LI
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >TenTec mailing list
> >TenTec@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|