To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials |
From: | Jack Mandelman <modelman@ieee.org> |
Reply-to: | k1vt@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 07 Jan 2011 20:46:29 -0500 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Steve, In your plot how are you defining S, the spacing between conductors? Is it center to center? Is it consistent for both the approximated and actual curves? It appears that only the actual curve uses the center to center definition; in the limit as S-->d the inner edge to inner edge spacing goes to zero, and Zo also goes to zero. Jack K1VT >Jerry, >A picture paints a thousand words: >http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/temp/ladderline_zo.png >73, >Steve G3TXQ >On 07/01/2011 22:44, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote: >>/ I've published the same article twice now, once in The VHF'er in 1966/ >>/ and last year in the proceedings of the 2010 Central States VHF >>Conference./ >> >>/ So I have it available on line but not in a format that will be found by/ >>/ search engines:/ >>/ http://www.geraldj.networkiowa.com/papers/CSVHF2010/lztl1.JPG/ >>/ http://www.geraldj.networkiowa.com/papers/CSVHF2010/lztl2.JPG/ >>/ I suppose I should work up an html page that could be found by a search/ >>/ engine and expand it with the history as I have found it./ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Richards |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Vertical Dipole for 80/160m, Barrett Thompson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |