TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology
From: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:32:12 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Steve, I'm already on an island, and come to think of it, so are you!


-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Steve Hunt
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 12:22 PM
To: Walt Amos; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology

Walt,

Exactly right!

Of course, if those 120 radials extended several wavelengths from the 
antenna, well into into the Fresnel Zone, they might begin to have some 
effect on the elevation angle. But by the time the radials get that far 
away, even 120 are pretty sparse and have a limited effect on the soil 
conductivity.

Best option is just to buy that property you always promised yourself by 
the ocean edge, or better still an island ;)

73,
Steve G3TXQ

On 07/01/2011 17:10, Walt Amos wrote:
> Yogh, Steve:
>
> So, what is improved by the old adage 120 radials are needed? The
EFFICIENCY ? Certainly not the radiation angle by your graph!
>
> Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI.
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>