TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins)

from [Ken Brown] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: N4PY2 <n4py2@earthlink.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins)
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:14:19 -1000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
> Years ago I had a vertical dipole for 40 meters and a raised vertical with 3 
> radials 10 feet above the ground.  The raised vertical was about 6 DB better 
> than the vertical dipole for European stations.  The raised vertical was 10 
> feet off the ground at the bottom with 3 full size radials (33 feet long). 
> I like raised verticals.
>
>   
How high above ground was the dipole? How long was the dipole? A half 
wavelength?

DE N6KB
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Dr. Gerald N. Johnson
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), N4PY2
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]