To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) |
From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:09:25 -1000 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi Rick, I'll have to review this, maybe I am suffering from a false memory, or an accurate memory of false information. I thought that a poor counterpoise under a vertical reduced the overall efficiency AND had a negative effect on the pattern diminishing the low angle radiation more than the higher angle radiation. N6LF's studies may help clear it up. > > The number of radials won't really affect the angle of radiation. > With a poor ground, you will still have a low take-off angle; you'll just > had a heck of a lot of ground losses. > > > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Richards |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Richards |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |