TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc.

from [Richards] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc.
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:52:09 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
Nice post, Joe.    A lot of buckshot in that one shell.

Thank - especially for replying in the spirit I intended my
post in.  Maybe this Eagle is the right balance between
old style and approach and new technology and higher
performance.   Sure hope so.

=======================  K8JHR  ===========================

On 9/29/2010 2:50 AM, Joe Roberts wrote:

> Progress is a mixed bag.

> But it is not better in ALL ways. There are trade-offs.
>
=============================================================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [TenTec] saw this at QRZ.COM, Art Trampler
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc., Kris Merschrod
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc., Joe Roberts
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc., Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]