TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] The Eagle

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle
From: kc9cdt@aol.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:02:10 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
NOW..THAT"S WHAT I LIKE ABOUT TT... A company that actually listens to 
and responds to customer needs/desires!
We need a hell of a lot more of those around.....The foreign ones sure 
don't.
I got no use for their stuff anymore!

I run older Americam tube stuff and TT!

73,
Lee, KC9CDT




-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Sep 26, 2010 8:51 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle


Excellent! That's a real competitive advantage over the TS-590. With 
the
inclusion of the IF port, SDR-IQ (or LP-PAN), and N4PY control 
software,
that's an extremely power operating combination, especially given the
Eagle's initial Rx performance specification.

Paul, W9AC


----- Original Message -----
From: "N4PY2" <n4py2@earthlink.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle


> John Henry told me they would add a 9 mhz IF output. He said it was 
very
> easy to do.
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> 121 Little Bell Drive
> Hays, NC 28635
> www.n4py.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 8:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle
>
>
>>> I want the best darn radio I can get for the lowest possible price.
>>> I don't want to pay for options which I will NEVER use, like a Pan
>>> adapter.
>>
>> That's the single-most reason for the I.F. output. You don't pay for
>> something you don't need as you would with an internal panadapter. 
The
>> addition of the I.F. jack adds extremely little production cost to 
add a
>> BNC
>> or RCA jack and an RF source-follower. I did it on another 
transceiver
>> for
>> under USD $5.00 at my cost. As a manufacturer, TT could leverage 
that
>> for
>> even less. But just having that port pays huge dividends to those who
>> want
>> it. Everyone wins: those who don't want a panadapter, those who do, 
and
>> TT
>> who puts in little effort and cost to get it. And, with enough 
interest,
>> TT
>> could offer an external panadapter later on (like the Elecraft P3). 
That
>> fulfills your concept of getting the product to market in a hurry. 
Then,
>> worry about the add-ons later. TT already has some experience with 
that
>> concept :-)
>>
>> BTW, agree with you on the spare set of RCA jacks. Even that would be
>> better than no port at all. Although easy enough to add, I think many
>> folks
>> will be apprehensive about drilling a hole in a new $2K rig as well 
as
>> potential concerns for voiding the factory warranty.
>>
>> Paul, W9AC
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>