TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] swr

To: <geraldj@weather.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] swr
From: John - K4WJ <k4wjfoc1749@wildblue.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:57:23 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jerry,

I subscribe to the TenTec forum to learn about TenTec products, not to learn 
about antennas. If I wanted to learn about antennas, I would subscribe to an 
antenna forum.

All hams need electricity to work another station. Does that make it 
appropriate to discuss basic electricity on this forum? How about copper 
wire? You have to draw the line somewhere.

The subject is very interesting but it is not appropriate for this 
reflector. But then this reflector has always been a strange duck in my 
opinion.

73..de John/K4WJ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] swr


> All hams need to learn about antennas and that makes this as appropriate
> a forum as any. No ham station makes contacts without any antenna.
>
> 73, Jerry, K0CQ
>
> On 8/17/2010 2:28 PM, george fritkin wrote:
>> This discussion needs to be in a venue where people understand antennas.
>> George, W6GF
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>