TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: Line Isolator Balun (sorta) question.]

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: Line Isolator Balun (sorta) question.]
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:43:09 +0100
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
It might be worth expanding on Jim's valuable point about the 
undesirability of chokes which have Reactive CM impedance, rather than 
Resistive.

Here's an experiment those of you with antenna modelling software can try:
Take a 20m half-wave dipole 30ft above average ground. Connect coax 
braid between one side of the feedpoint and ground. Insert a 20 ohm 
resistor at the bottom of the braid to represent a moderately effective 
ground connection. Now look at the current flows at the feedpoint.

With no choke:
Dipole Leg1 = 1A; Dipole Leg2 = 0.96A; Braid = 0.15A

With 270 ohm INDUCTIVE choke at the feedpoint:
Dipole Leg1 = 1A; Dipole Leg2 = 0.31A; Braid = 0.7A

With 270 ohm RESISTIVE choke at the feedpoint:
Dipole Leg1 = 1A; Dipole Leg2 = 0.92A; Braid = 0.1A

See how adding an Inductive choke has INCREASED the braid current 
dramatically!

Also note how the 270 ohm Resistive choke has improved things, but not 
by much; you need a Resistive choke of at least 4000 ohms to get the 
braid current below 0.01A in this instance. That should dispel the old 
Rule-of-Thumb about needing 5 times the antenna feedpoint impedance for 
the choke impedance.

Steve G3TXQ


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>