It's interesting that these 4 high-performance radios differ mostly in their
user interface - and price, of course:
miniature (K3)
computer-only (Flex)
B&W (Orion)
Color (Orion II)
73 Martin AA6E
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:36 AM, <Rsoifer@aol.com> wrote:
> The Sherwood test data for the top receivers (K3, Flex 5000, Orion, Orion
> II) do not show what I would call major differences in performance from one
> to another. Given that, if value for money is used as a criterion, I
> suppose the K3 would win, followed by a used 565 Orion. That said, my
> Orion II
> is not for sale.
>
> 73 Ray W2RS
>
>
> In a message dated 7/21/2010 1:17:48 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
> it5tntweb@aliceposta.it writes:
>
> Which are the true improvements from orion to orion II?
> We omit lcd to colors or the processore faster, we speak
> about the improvements of performances
> that can be felt from a model to the other.
> Better the receiver, better audio in ssb? What?
> Thanks!!
> __________________
> 73 Simone IZ5DKJ
>
> http://www.ir3ip.net/iz5dkj/
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
--
Dr. Martin S. Ewing, AA6E
Member IEEE, URSI, AAS, ARRL
Branford, Connecticut
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|