TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] wither CW

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] wither CW
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 21:55:59 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The good news is that many new hams, like me, are learning
the CODE regardless of its being required.   I am not very
good at it yet.   But I think it is part of being complete
operator  (no I am not starting a re-war on the topic, but
I want to know how to do it so I can use the entire band.)


I think CW will survive much better than some think, and
that will be good for ham radio, overall.


================== K8JHR   ================================




Roy wrote:
> "...and liked Ten-Tec's QSK rigs a
> lot. As a keen CW operator I do hate the new slogan"
> 
> 
> I like to think we are allowing the silly sideblasters to pay for most of 
> the development and mass-production of our CW rigs in disguise, so as to 
> keep prices lower.
> 
> 73,  Roy    K6XK
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>