TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni C question

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni C question
From: ab9go@earthlink.net
Reply-to: ab9go@earthlink.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:01:55 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I wish they would have used a slide rule dial with a standard dial cord 
arrangement like just about every other manufacturer did at the time.  That 
elastic band arrangement is just poor IMHO.  

Randy AB9GO  


-----Original Message-----
>From: David Goncalves <davegoncalves@gmail.com>
>Sent: May 10, 2010 9:16 AM
>To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni C question
>
>Yeah, only decaying rubber bands.
>
>David Goncalves
>
>On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Hulett, Russell
><rhulett1@consolidated.net>wrote:
>
>> That's one advantage for the Omni A, Triton 540, and other analog display
>> rigs, no timebase, processor, or other chips to deal with.
>>
>> 73, Curt KB5JO
>>  _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>David Goncalves
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


Thank you,
Randy AB9GO
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>