TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: Phonetics

To: geraldj@storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Phonetics
From: "Todd (N0KMA)" <n0kma@att.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:53:19 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I do understand why during contest and such that 59 or 599 is used for 
every contact.  It just makes everything uniform for logging and log 
submitting to the contest sponsors.  During ragchews or more informal 
QSO's i really appreciate a proper signal report.  Lets me know in what 
directions i need to improve my transmitted signal.  Although i have had 
QSO's abruptly ended i assume because i didn't provide a 59 or 599 when 
that is what i received.  Oh well many more important things to worry 
about than that i guess.  73

Todd
NØKMA

Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote:

> Or the standard DX contest report, "59 but please repeat your
> information."
> 
> Which means the signal report is stuck at 59 or 599 no matter what the
> true condition of the received signal.
> 
> 73, Jerry, K0CQ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>