Thanks Jack for the reply. I agree with you based on my present 17 year old
Omni. Others have responded the INRAD while better, are for the select few
and expensive. (((73))) Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack B. Friend" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 564 9 mHz Filters
>i have all my filter slots full with TT 250Hz and 500Hz filters. i have
> not tried Inrad filters so can't compare. i like the TT filters as they
> are relatively quiet and have no ring. also found them thru this
> reflector at considerably less than retail.
>
> jack
>
>
> On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 20:16 -0400, Bob Good wrote:
>> I just purchased an Omni VI Plus (564) and I am looking to fill my "N-2"
>> filter slot. I have a 1.8 mHz TT filter in N-1 and the full complement
>> in
>> the 6.3 slots. I am 90% cw and have operated a Omni VI (563) for 17
>> years.
>> I want a 500 Hz filter in this slot. In your opinion should I purchase
>> the
>> TT 217 or an "Inrad" filter? Roofing filter is a term I have yet to
>> learn.
>> Your thoughts would be appreciated. Any help for the OM? Thanks Bob
>> K4BG
>> k4bg@planters.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|