TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New Firmware

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Firmware
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:32:25 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Regardless of who is right and who is not, about the various points raised
here about Ten Tec radios - a little response from the company, right here
in this forum, would go a very long way toward reducing confusion and
frustration.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff - W4GPL" <w4gpl@w4gpl.us>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Firmware


> Several people on this very reflector have claimed they e-mailed key
> people within TenTec and received no reply.
>
> And why not kill several birds with one stone and just have a
> representative from TenTec address the concerns via the reflector?
>
> I've said it time in and time out, if my Omni VII never improves with
> firmware updates, it'll still be a fine rig. But it'll be contrary to
> their enthusiasm about the ability to upgrade/add/change features when
> they first added that ability to their later models.
>
> A little transparency would likely go a long way.
>
> Jeff
>
> jkelly wrote:
> > I have an idea.  How about anyone that is unhappy
> > with TenTec send a email directly to them?
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Jeff - W4GPL" <w4gpl@w4gpl.us>
> > To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 8:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Firmware
> >
> >
> >> I am so utterly sick and tired of this sort of reply to criticism of
> >> TenTec. If you dare critique a loved one about something going on in
> >> their life, do they assume you don't love them just the same? Making a
> >> valid comparison between companies in the same industry does not mean
> >> someone is unhappy with their TenTec gear. God forbid TenTec owners
hold
> >> TenTec to certain expectations -- and just maybe, if TenTec was more
> >> communicative on this reflector, there wouldn't be so much speculation
> >> and criticism.
> >>
> >> d.e.warnick@comcast.net wrote:
> >>> So what you're saying is that every couple of hours or days at the
most,
> >>> you get to load new software? Sounds great.
> >>>
> >>> Since the Orion II is such junk, make me a great offer to take it off
> >>> your hands.
> >>>
> >>> Dave
> >>> WA3MKB
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> TenTec mailing list
> >> TenTec@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>