A very common issue from my past experience.
73
Bob, K4TAX
----- Original Message -----
From: <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again
> Well one scenario I can thing of is someone installs after market
> software,
> it doesn't work right and many features left out, radio is sold as is to
> new
> owner, new owner says this is a piece of @^$$%# and send it off to TenTec
> with a nasty letter saying effectively , FIX THIS PIECE OF #^%@ AS YOU
> MADE
> IT ! Probably not quite a WIN-WIN for poor old TenTec ?
>
> Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com>
> To: <TenTec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:39 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] Open sourcing again
>
>
>>
>> It would sure seem that TT could kill two birds with one stone by
>> allowing
>> 3rd parties to write
>> code for their radios. Proprietary software is a valuable business asset
>> but only if you
>> capitalize on it . Since TT is seemingly not willing (or able) to drive
>> sales of their radios
>> by demonstrating a capability of providing the software updates and
>> enhancements they tout in
>> the advertisements, it would seem smart to allow others to do so.
>>
>> I'm not sure why this is not seen as a win-win by them.
>>
>> John K5MO
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|