> It depends on what kind of ugly. If they are ugly in highly articulate
> ways, it's the strongest signal. In case of a tie it's the one whose
> audio characteristics most closely match the frequency range that the
> (receiving station's) operator's ears are most sensitive to. Of course,
> if the signals are just plain ugly and distorted in ways that do not
> enhance intelligibility, the transmitting station does not get in the
> log book. This tends to keep most of them intelligible, even though they
> might not necessarily be pleasant to listen to.
>
> 73,
> Mike
> NM7X
Mike: I think you just accurately described my old 4th grade teacher, Mrs.
Slaughter! My ears are still ringing 50 years later ;~)
Ron N6IE
www.N6IE.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Gorniak" <mgorniak@genesiswireless.us>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RF speech processors
>
> Mike Gorniak writes...
>
>>/ My experiences with being the one on the "other side" of a pile up
> />/ concur with this philosophy as well. It's the ugly signals that cut
> />/ through the clutter first. THEN, I can work the rest of the guys.
> /
> But what if all the signals are ugly?
>
> Rick, KR9D
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|