TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Time Sharing Radio Access?

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Time Sharing Radio Access?
From: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:35:54 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Perhaps a  condo ham club ? I know that my local old folks home could use 
such a gathering .  Great Idea !  John Kb2huk
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Time Sharing Radio Access?


> Any other hams in the complex? My Dad lives in a retirement building and 
> he
> has pretty much the same problem, and there are other hams with same 
> problem
> in same complex.
> You might see if the condo association would allow you to put up some kind
> of hf antenna around the parameter of the room...a loop perhaps, and use
> some kind of sharing access with other hams in the complex.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Rippey" <w3uls73@gmail.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 10:27 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] Time Sharing Radio Access?
>
>
>> For most of the past year I have not had access to an HF rig due to 
>> having
>> moved into a condo apartment in Wash DC. It is a 1950s vintage building
>> and
>> its concrete/rebar construction effectively eliminates HF signals. (The
>> reason for the move was principally due to, but not limited to, medical
>> issues.) I truly miss being on the air.
>> So I have been casting around for options. One, of course, is to set up a
>> remote site using a dedicated computer and an OMNI VII. However, I have
>> not
>> sussed out how this could be done, practically speaking.
>>
>> I'm wondering whether Ten-Tec (or someone else) would not consider 
>> setting
>> up computers, OMNI VIIs, and antennas and renting them out in a
>> time-sharing
>> sort of arrangement. I certainly would be willing to pay for such access
>> from my home computer and would be spared the nuisance of maintaining a
>> remote site operation, which would have to be, in all likelihood, at some
>> remove from my home. This could well be a profitable sideline for the
>> person(s) offering this service.
>>
>> If FCC rules conflict, then I would suggest asking the Commission to 
>> think
>> about changing them. I am sure I am not the only ham who has had to go 
>> QRT
>> due to circumstances beyond his/her control.
>>
>> Since I'm particularly an HF enthusiast, the idea of remote links via the
>> VHF options that are proliferating do have much appeal. I want to hear 
>> the
>> QRN and QRM.
>>
>> Any thoughts as to the practicality of this idea?
>>
>> John, W3ULS
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 5.7 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 1256 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>