TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 546c advice

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 546c advice
From: jones_winston@bellsouth.net
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:21:35 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
 
I also once owned an Omni A (analog) and the later Omni C. Both are great rigs.


However, there was a design problem in the Omni C on 17 meters that was due to 
the conversion scheme used.  I've heard it explained better by some 
engineer-type hams than I can do. I understand it caused spurs to be 
transmitted.


73,
Winston K4CWQ


  -------------- Original message from "k8bbm@srt.com" <k8bbm@srt.com>: 
--------------


> I go along with all said about Omni a-c,, have had all 3,
> currently have B and C - they were topflight then, and still hold
> their own - excellent cw, and same on ssb, altho I don't use them
> much onthat.
> 
> 1979-1980, Omni C, power supply, vfo, were around $1200-1300.
> and the matching Hercules 444 was about 1600 - 
> makes an awesome "superstation" 
> some people have complained about 17 mtrs signal quality, I've
> not had any complaints.
> 
> I think $500 for the c, with the accessories is a good price
> Dave 
> K8BBM
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>