TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:24:53 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Any chance you can post that photo?

         Ron   N6IE
      www.N6IE.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII


> Well, Mike, this is most distressing.  My friend is going to be 
> furious.  I'm a little upset myself, because I was told by the engineer 
> responsible for the board that the one he had at Dayton was final test 
> version, and it was going into production shortly after the Hamvention.  
> He apologized for the delay and said that it was a more complicated 
> project than he'd at first thought but that it was now finally ready to 
> be produced.  I asked him to hold the board up so that I could take a 
> picture of it.  I showed this photo to my friend as proof that the board 
> was on its way and that any further delay would be a short one measured 
> in months not years.   In  fact, I remember that I actually placed a 
> mobile phone call to my friend to give him a live, first-hand report 
> from the Dayton Hamvention with the good news.  In addition to his Orion 
> II he owns several other pieces of Ten-Tec gear.  The way he was talking 
> he will sell all of it and swear never to buy a piece of TT gear again 
> if my report from Dayton turns out to have been false.  IMHO, this is 
> not a good way to run a business.  Personally, I'm not planning on 
> selling my OMNI VII over this issue, but it does leave a bad taste in my 
> mouth.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Carl
> N8VZ
> 
> 
> Mike Christiansen wrote:
>> Carl, that is a brand new webpage the Tentec just put up last week, so  
>> the information IMO is current.  This may not be the news your friend  
>> was hoping for
>>
>> Mike, N4GW
>>
>> On Aug 17, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Carl J. Denbow wrote:
>>
>>   
>>> Thanks, Mike. If this is not an old, not-updated post, I was lied to  
>>> at
>>> Dayton.  I was shown a prototype board and was told it was ready for
>>> production.  In fact, I was told that the week after Dayton they would
>>> be having a production meeting and that the board would be ready for
>>> general sales within three months or so.  A friend of mine who  
>>> bought an
>>> ORION II about three years ago was told at that time that the board
>>> would be ready "in a few months."  He's ready to ditch his Ten-Ten
>>> equipment he is so mad about this issue.  When I gave him the
>>> information from Dayton, including my live sitting of the prototype
>>> board, he calmed down a little and said he'd give Ten-Tec a few more
>>> months.  In short, I hope what I was told at Dayton is more accurate
>>> than this link.  Perhaps, at this juncture Ten-Tec's recent "sins" are
>>> no more than not updating a web page! :-)
>>>
>>> Mike Christiansen wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Check this link at the Tentec site.  it should answer your questions
>>>>
>>>> http://radio.tentec.com/status/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 17, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Carl J. Denbow wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>> Does anyone know the status the new display board that is coming out
>>>>> for
>>>>> the OMNI VII and ORION II?  I saw a prototype at Dayton and was
>>>>> assured
>>>>> that it was ready for production.  This board will allow, among  
>>>>> other
>>>>> things, for real time, continuous spectrum scope (like the ICOM 756
>>>>> pro
>>>>> series has).  I'm really looking forward to this new board, which is
>>>>> supposed to cost in the $300.00 range.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carl
>>>>> N8VZ
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>     
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>>   
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>