To: | "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss |
From: | "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com> |
Reply-to: | Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:34:02 -0700 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Al wrote: 'snip' > is all that is required, ANY wire can be called resonant and there is > nothing to distinguish such wires from a halfwave wire. When I wrote 'any wire' I assumed that, given the context of the discussion, that I meant any length wire that had it's reactance cancelled leaving the wire length intact. I hope this clears up that point. 73, AL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New Rig...., Alfred Lorona |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss, Alfred Lorona |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss, Alfred Lorona |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |