To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Information |
From: | Ten-Tec Amateur Radio Sales <sales@tentec.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 29 May 2008 15:12:18 -0400 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
>yqj: Referring to Elecraft here as being smart, they >will state in public that your idea has value - "it's >on the list", whether or not it's an actual priority. I'm not sure I understand how that would have benefited Ten-Tec if we had done the same thing. You're saying that acknowledging a request publicly and then not acting on it because it's not a priority is smart customer service? When we've done that in the past vis a vis the Orion and other radios we've later regretted it. 73 Scott Robbins W4PA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni 546 Series C RF power amp advice sought (long post), Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Early Ten-Tec's appropriate for a blind person?, W1GOR |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Frequency "readout" for a blind person, Marinus Loewensteijn |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Information, J.T. Turner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |