To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield |
From: | Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 20 May 2008 14:03:39 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Leukemia I read the survey results From the FCC and other publications on biological effects or RFI. No authority on the subject by a long shot. Magnetic fields and inadequate shielding is a hazard. Follow the ARRL publications on the distances and FCC requirements for annual testing of your station, and you cannot go wrong. The fact that they even want us to do this should say HAY THERE IS SOMETHING TO THIS ! Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter, ron |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Argonaut V Intermittent TX - Mea Culpa, Rick Williams |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] RF, Charles Harpole |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield, Ron Castro |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |