Recognizing a wealth of expertise on this mailing list I like to invite your
input on something that has kept me occupied for the past few days.
I like to add a CW filter to my Omni-C. TenTec has sold out of the 217 (500 Hz)
and still has the 218 (1.8 kHz) and 219 (250hz). In planning is a replacement
manufactured by Inrad.
The consensus seems to be that the 500 Hz is more frequently used than the 250
Hz.
Have been looking at a few alternative options from Inrad, the 8 pole 1000 Hz
#766, the 8 pole 400 hz # 759 and the 4 pole 600 Hz #763. Looking at the curves
on the old Inrad website I see that the 1000 Hz filter has approx 4dB insertion
loss, the 400 Hz approx 9 dB and the 600 Hz about 2.5 dB.
The Omni-C has a filter board that can take the 1.8 khz and the 500 Hz filter.
This board has an amplifier to offset the filter losses. The 1.8 kHz filter
position has a 1 dB amplification and the 500 Hz filter position has a 7 dB
amplification.
(The 250 Hz filter has an approx 14 dB loss)
I am thinking about using the 4 pole 600 Hz filter: I feel it will provide
better IMD / dynamic range performance because it can go in the 1.8 kHz slot.
This should go well with the 500 Hz audio filter which is built in.
Am I missing something / have an error in my reasoning?
Many thanks, 73, Marinus, ZL2ML
_________________________________________________________________
News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|